Friday, June 27, 2014

The Fine Line Between Confidence and Self Perception

During my time as a Prep School coach, I came to an important realization a few times a year. As I spent hour upon hour working to place good players in college programs, I found that often the players themselves became their own worst enemy. Usually, that was my primary obstacle. Recently, it has been the transfer list too. Instead of simply needing to convince players that the offer in front of them is a good one, that they'd be crazy to pass up despite the fact it is not the level they want, high school coaches are now dealing with a smaller window for true freshmen due to unhappy transfers leaving their current situations. I came to the conclusion that the issues that I faced with my own players are the same as many of those transfers are facing. The problem is self perception and an inability to see reality. The problems that come of this are two fold. First, it has created a log jam at the low major level as transfers who realistically realized they can't play where they were try to drop to a smaller school, and as a result, are taking spots from those that are waiting until the spring to sign because they believe they are Division 1 players, and just need a shot at a small school. The low major schools now have many more choices.

The problem has led me to this conclusion: Unrealistic self perception is an epidemic, a disease, a major problem in amateur basketball. It also is a result of human nature; it is natural to think that we are better than we actually are. Its natural to think that those who give us their honest opinion or evaluation, if its not what we want to hear, are 'haters' or don't believe in us. But what if they're right?

In working at a prominent prep school, I came to work with players who are "D1 focused." They're at prep school because they're "D1 Focused" and they "Just need to be seen," just lacking "exposure." My natural response is, 'That's probably not going to happen,' which is also why I was never the best prep school recruiter. I believe that more players are flocking to Juco's and Prep Schools for one main reason. They "know" they're good, they just haven't found the right person to agree with them. Parents can be biased in this way too, and shell out thousands of dollars to prep schools because they can't believe no one has 'discovered' how good their son is. Eventually, they find their way to a prep school (that has a good recruiter, unlike me), who tells them that their son is the greatest player they've ever seen, and is going to 'blow up' this year and get a D1 scholarship........ if you pay $15-25,000 dollars for one year of 'prep school.' What ends up happening is the schools that didn't recruit the 'hidden gem' are ultimately right, and that player finds themselves in the same position they were in before their family shelled out all that money for prep school. That prep school recruiter? He or his school pocketed the money and played the guys that already have D1 offers. The paying player sat on the bench all year, again ending up with maybe a D2 or NAIA scholarship that they stick their noses up at because its 'not D1.' Thus, the player who refuses to look at themselves realistically completes the cycle and again, ends up with nothing.

Sound familiar? It happens all the time. This is because many prep schools make money based on the fact that you believe you are better than you actually are. My advice? Look at what you have in front of you. If you are a senior or a post grad and you have a scholarship offer, then be as grateful as is humanly possible and sign that letter of intent before someone else at your position does. You are getting a college education, for FREE. Take that, because it means you've used basketball the right way and will graduate with no debt. Not a bad deal. Otherwise, if you pass it up and pay for a 25k/yr prep school then you are letting adults who know better use basketball to use you for your parents' money.

Now think about what happens if you actually are right, and everyone has misjudged you? This does occasionally happen. If you're at a small school and develop into a pro-caliber player, do you know what happens? The pros still find you. Look no further than examples like Damian Lillard (Weber State), Scottie Pippen (Central Arkansas), and Ben Wallace (D2's Virginia Union). These players took advantage of what was presented to them, put in the work necessary to improve and succeed, and the pros took notice. This proves that it ultimately doesn't matter where you play, as much as what you do with the opportunity you're given. So don't stick your nose up at the small schools, look at your current situation realistically, and move forward with the options in front of you.

Now, on to the transfers. If you do wait on a few smaller school offers and a big school offer comes in very late, then know this, you were not their first choice. They are taking a gamble on you, and if you don't work out, its not a big deal to them. Instead of playing right away at a smaller school, you will be sitting all year, using up eligibility as it becomes obvious you can't play at that level. Maybe you just needed to try, and using a year was worth that gamble. That's OK. I understand that. But if you're frustrated by the situation and believe that your coach doesn't believe in you, then you're starting the same cycle all over again. Please learn and go to the level you can play at. I recently had a former player transfer from a D2 and ask me to get him some D1 looks. If you're not a D2 starter, averaging 20 points/gm, and you don't have D1's knocking down your door the second your transfer paperwork is in, then you can't transfer up. Generally, the rule is unless you are the league POY, then you transfer down, to where your real level is. And if you play marginal minutes as a freshman, perhaps your real level is right where you are.

As you can see, an unrealistic self perception can be a dangerous thing. Take a look in the mirror and realize that it is OK that your level isn't where you always hoped it would be. A college scholarship is a terrible thing to waste... take it from someone who is still paying his college off. Thinking you are better than you actually are, and being too stubborn to admit your level could end up costing you and your parents a lot of time, money, and positive memories. It could leave you bitter, and upset. Please be realistic, embrace what you have, and do your best to be the best wherever you are.

For more information, follow me on twitter @coachdesautels

Wednesday, June 18, 2014

Reclassifying FAQ's

Over the past couple of years, I've received numerous questions about reclassifying. Here are some that may answer some of your questions. If you need me to clarify or follow up, send an email to (adamdesautels@gmail.com), or message me on twitter @coachdesautels.

Q: I'm a 9th grader + want to reclassify, how do I start? A: Once you begin HS, you must graduate w/ your original class to be NCAA Eligible. In other words, once you begin HS, you don't reclassify unless you graduate on time and spend a post-grad year at a Prep School.

Q: How can you reclassify athletically but not academically? A: Go to a prep or take a year after HS. Still must graduate on time. But athletic only 'reclassifying' should only be done after graduating HS. Otherwise, its an easy to spot ploy to mask one's age.

Q: I'm young for my grade, can I just reclassify to the grade I should be in? A: No, not after you begin 9th grade. To be academically eligible through the NCAA, you must graduate on time with your original high school class.

Q: Where can I find all this information in one place? A: Here's a quick reference guide from the NCAA: http://fs.ncaa.org/Docs/eligibility_center/Quick_Reference_Sheet.pdf. 

Q: I play U17, and some of my opponents are 20. How are they eligible?
A: They're not. If they're playing AAU at 20, its JUCO or bust.

Q: My coach or parent wants me to reclassify, should I?
A: I wouldn't. Focus on graduating on time. Often, these suggestions are uninformed or fueled by alternative motives. Check why they are suggesting you reclassify. Often coaches promote programs through rankings. If you're highly ranked in a lower class, they can use that to recruit future players. If you're paying to be on the team, your parents have to cut that coach a check for another year. Parents can (occasionally) get caught up in the rankings hype as well. Reclassifying can mask your age, which may result in a higher ranking, more publicity for you, your club, etc... but it comes at a price: your eligibility. 

Q: If I graduate on time, should I do prep school or JUCO? A: Depends on 2 factors - $ + time of eligibility. Prep is expensive, Juco isn't. While cheaper (or free), JUCO also counts against NCAA eligibility clock. One year at a Prep doesn't.

Q: Do prep schools offer scholarships? A: Depends on the school. Most players on scholarship already have HM offers but need a PG year. I wouldn't bank on earning a prep school scholarship, if you need one, you should be looking at JUCOs.

Q: How do prep school classes help you qualify in that extra year? A: D1 players can take up to one extra core. D2 players can take unlimited.

Q: What are the benefits to JUCO over prep school?
A: Many. JUCO is cheaper or free, you can gain eligibility if not eligible after HS, Juco is highly competitive still, and you could see playing time when otherwise you would be on the bench in college, among many more reasons. There is no shame in going to a JUCO. 


Q: How can I make sure to make a good decision about reclassifying?
A: Check with people who know the system, and make sure to graduate on time, all else is futile without that piece.

For more information, follow me on twitter @coachdesautels




Thursday, June 5, 2014

What's Wrong With College Athletes Transferring Schools?

On ESPN, Jeff Goodman has reported over 525 transfers from Division 1 alone in 2014. Many see this as an epidemic, a problem with the culture of youth basketball, a problem with society, a problem with parents, coaches, or the kids themselves. However, here are the questions that should really be posed: is the high number of transfers actually a problem? Is the high number of transfers out of line with other issues of workplace loyalty seen in the United States?

In actuality, any one of the problems mentioned above may be true based on the case of a specific student-athlete. However, based on circumstance, the player transferring is doing what they perceive to be in their best interest. Fans get angry because they may be losing a player from their favorite program, but again, that fan is angry because the kid is not doing what is in the fan's best interest.

Let's get one important thing straight. College basketball players are not the only ones who 'transfer.' The average American (for this argument, we will use those who entered the workforce around the year 2000) changes jobs every 4.4 years. That averages out to 15-20 job changes over the course of a career according to Forbes Magazine. So instead of asking why players transfer, the real question should be: why do people transfer?

Think now about why we change jobs:

Lack of appreciation
Mistreatment by supervisors
Chance at a promotion
Higher Salary Elsewhere
Fired due to lack of satisfactory performance
Desire for a better schedule
A need for a change...

Why college players transfer:

Not getting playing time
Don't get along with coaches
Chance to play in a more competitive conference
Opportunity for a Master's degree at another school
Asked to leave by a coach due to lack of on-court performance
Better fit in another system
Coach was fired, and they'd like to play for someone other than the replacement...

Are these lists really that different?

Right or wrong, this is our society. No longer common are the days of the four year starter at the small school who has no further aspirations beyond playing for the team they grew up cheering for. No longer common are the days of the employee who works forty years in the same job and retires. This is not to say it doesn't happen, but it isn't the norm.

When I worked at Westwind Prep, we would occasionally get players who were on their fourth or fifth high school. Kids change club teams all the time. Professional athletes change sports teams all the time. People change jobs all the time.

Why then, are we so surprised and angered when kids transfer from a college? A total of 4,381 scholarships are offered to division 1 Men's basketball players ("Scholarship"). The 525 transfers this season equals just over 8% of that total. It seems to me that transferring is not an epidemic, but a realistic representation of the movement within the American work force.

Don't get me wrong, as someone who has worked with and coached dozens of athletes who went on to perform at the college level, I have nothing but respect for those who stick it out wherever they land. Chances are that they do so because they have already developed the work ethic to be successful wherever they're at. As a coach, I would always warn my players when making a decision to choose a place they envision spending four years at. Somewhere they want to be beyond the basketball court. If no options they loved presented themselves, I often steered them towards the JUCO ranks.
Personally, I think that the ability to compete at a level in which one must earn playing time builds character. I often catch myself shaking my head when players transfer for 'more exposure', or 'more playing time'. I think persevering through adversity is one of the most valuable lessons one can learn as they go through high school and college.

However, not everyone is the same. For some it takes longer, and for some it takes a change of location, a fresh start to help them discover who they really are and who they really can be. While I have my strongly held beliefs against transferring for the usual reasons, I can't judge kids when constant change has become a part of our culture. While I believe gaining the work ethic to be successful where one is currently is more important than moving to a place with less competition, I also understand that every case is different. As a result, I don't feel the panic and hatred for those that do transfer schools that I see from many.

Teaching loyalty and commitment in our nation's youth is vital, but its also important to note that college is a place serving the purpose of preparing people for the future. In a society where the average American changes jobs every 4-5 years, I don't see a problem with college students doing the same. It may not be ideal for a particular fan base or coaching staff, but teaching someone to pursue the best fit for themselves is not such a bad lesson considering the statistics and realities of our current society.

Like it or hate it, this is the way it is, and the transfer list is just going to grow, just as more and more people continue to change jobs.

Either way, those with the work ethic and determination to stay in one's school or job are probably going to be just fine in the long run. When we look at the transfer list, instead of shaking our heads and swearing under our breath, maybe we should just hope that the player transferring can find the right place where they want to stay, and can learn the lessons necessary for them to transfer into productive citizens by the time their college careers are over.

For more information, follow me on twitter @coachdesautels

Works Cited:
Meister, Jeanne. 2012.  Job hopping is the new normal for millennials. www.forbes.com.

Scholarships for athletes. 2007. www.scholarshipforathletes.com.